POK or POP

Should India talk about Pakistan Occupied Politicians (PoP) instead of Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) ?

          Indian Politicians are suddenly found kowtowing Pakista. One of them, Srinagar MP and National Conference supremo Farooq Abdullah recently stirred up a controversy as he sparked with a claim that Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (PoK) actually belongs to Pakistan. Those on Indian side should stop talking about the azadi of PoK.

of course, it's about time, India started talking about Pakistan Occupied Politicians (PoP) of India. Farooq, in a way, has offered himself first. Then another PoP from BJP minister of state Jitendra Prasad jumped into the fray, levelling the statement as one, generated out of the frustration caused by Farooq's inability to capture power in J&K.  So, former state minister for foriegn affairs Mr. Salman Khursheed had to make real fast moves to cut into the story. He found another object for sniping at. Just imagine, who that could be? Unbelievable, but true....it is interenational terrorist Hafiz saeed. he sounded like revealing a super secret lethal Pakistani weapon, that mortally feared Indian Research and Analysis wing (RAW).

However, Twitter trolled the original PoP Farooq Abdullah in ample measure. This softball match should last, so that none of the PoP's remain out of purview.  

          ((फारूक अब्दुल्ला के बयान के बाद POK, पे नही POP ,"पाकिस्तान ऑक्युपाईड पॉलिटिशियन "
            चर्चा होनी चाहिए ये आखिर है किस देश से......इनकी देशभक्ति का DNA चेक करना जरूरी है))